In article <3A3AAE04.E2240E93@earthlink.net>, rdm### [at] earthlinknet wrote:

> Someone mentioned the advantages of adding a for statement to the pov
> ray syntax... I was wondering if this were something to happen in the
> 3.5 release... I think it would save allot of time in writing... Seeing
> how the for statement takes care of the initial variable declaration,
> the condition and the updating statement in one line...
> 
> Also wondering if we might be adopting the C++ conventions like the ++
> and += operators...?

Nope...see the message in povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions by 
Chris Cason, "POV-Team Status Report - September 1, 2000" for the latest 
information on POV 3.5. It includes the list of features the POV Team 
plans to include.



> Will we have a new Pov-Ray for X-Mas...=)

Unlikely...

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message