|
 |
In article <3c95cf69@news.povray.org>,
"Andrew Cocker" <big### [at] mariner9 fsnetcouk> wrote:
> Can you explain further? I thought Method 3 was the best (smoothest), and
> thus ideal for this.
Method 3 is basically like method 2, but it will take additional samples
where needed, so it gives the most accurate results for the amount of
work. I have no idea why he said it isn't good for this kind of
situation.
--
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
