|
|
In article <slr### [at] fwicom>, ron### [at] povrayorg
wrote:
> Yes. Without brackets of some kind, it would be harder to read and
> ambiguous to parse:
I was thinking that only valid identifiers would be useable as keys.
Basically a group of variables called by name, something that could
probably be done easily with a sort of name-mangling.
AssocArray:Val3 would be translated to _AssocArray__Val3_ or something
similarly unlikely to be used by the user. No special data structures
would need to be added, but it would be a little more limited.
If you can use any values as a key, but not identifiers, it is a bit
different...how about the function-like notation? Or just go back to the
[] array notation, which seems to work well enough in this case.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|