In article <3D4AD28B.126EA1F3@aol.com>, Dave Dunn <poi### [at] aolcom> 
wrote:

> You know, this is almost shaping up like an argument to modify the syntax
> of the torus object. You would, of course have to still call the original
> version by its name for backwards compatibility, but a torus2 object might
> be nice to have. I have always thought that it was odd that torus was the
> only primitive that could not be placed without a transformation anywhere
> else than at the Origin.

That would be strange, if it was true:

height_field
julia_fractal
lathe
sor
superellipsoid
text
poly
cubic
quartic
quadric

-- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message