In article <3db3e40d$1@news.povray.org>,
Timon Christl <chr### [at] nakatcha fmiuni-passaude> wrote:
> I disagree. Guess why C compilers do not have recursive include
> paths. And C exists since the 1970s, and an awful lot of software has
> been written in it, so if recursive include paths would actually have
> any benefits the compiler people would have introduced them a long time
> ago. Since they didn't there must be something wrong with that concept.
"C compilers don't have it so it's bad"...do I have to tell you how
faulty that reasoning is?
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
