In article <3DDCFF73.C06ACF8C@frege.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>,
 Mark Weyer <wey### [at] fregemathematikuni-freiburgde> wrote:

> You are right. But I still prefer the empty-object-method for
> some applications, because it is more elegant to my taste.

It is in no way "elegant". It needlessly slows things down, takes 
memory, and is just an ugly hack. The array method looks like the best 
way to do it: simple, flexible, doesn't waste processing power or do 
other odd things that could cause trouble. You don't need a "nothing" 
object.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message