In article <Xns### [at] 204213191226>,
 "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <raf### [at] raf256com> wrote:

> sorry, forgot to add this - I don't want to use media - it's slow and not 
> accurate. 

Actually, media is more accurate in most cases. And it usually isn't too 
slow to use.


> Imho scattering media with constant density will give proper effect, but - 
> how about add way to calculate this very tryvial effect without using 
> standart media - that is slow and innacurate ?

Absorbing media is the analog of attenuation, not scattering. And media 
is accurate, that's why it is slow.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message