Samuel Benge wrote:
>>
>> To me the difference seems very minor, not even close to 10x the 
>> accuracy value leading to the same result quality.
> 
> That's because you seem to be bent on using really low accuracy 
> settings, or something. All I'm implying is that it's not necessary to 
> use such low accuracy values all the time... it actually seems 'safe' 
> not to now, with the new patch.

I have no idea how you come to this conclusion, to me

http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/files/sam_test1_o01.png

looks much better than:

http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/files/sam_test1_i05.png

and it only uses 5 times the accuracy value.  I am using exactly the 
accuracy values you proposed (x05 meaning accuracy 0.05).

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message