Torsten Crass wrote:
>> That is more likely a difference in the way the function image type 
>> works.  Since your heightfield is realtively low resulution such a 
>> difference shows up more strongly than usual.  
> 
> 
> I see. Still funny it's not mentioned in the "changes from 3.5 -> 3.6" 
> list since it apparently isn't a mere bug fix or speed improvement.
> 

I don't remember the details but it probably is a change to make the way 
function images work more consistent.  I would not call it a bugfix 
although IIRC there have been complaints that function images don't work 
as expected in the past.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 01 May. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message