On 24 May 2000 18:26:36 -0400, ron### [at] povrayorg (Ron Parker)
wrote:

>I think merge is actually equivalent to
>
>intersection {
>  object { A inverse }
>  object { B inverse }
>  inverse
>}

It certainly looks like it, yes. Thanks for the info.

>but it's not represented that way internally.  The code actually has
>special cases for merge, unlike for difference.

Yes, I saw your reply to Warp after I posted :)


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message