POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test.binaries : Re: radiosity nag. : Re: radiosity nag. Server Time
2 May 2024 18:34:19 EDT (-0400)
  Re: radiosity nag.  
From: Christoph Hormann
Date: 6 Jun 2004 11:40:02
Message: <c9vdmc$64c$1@chho.imagico.de>
fomhorian wrote:
> Okidoki, but I don't know if it is that small...

You don't seriously want to call that minimal, do you?

The most likely explanation of the difference you observe is that one of 
your extremely ugly finish parameters is interpreted differently in 3.6 
as a side effect of another change.  When i remove all those finishes 
the results i get in 3.5 and 3.6 are idetical.

I really can't see a reason why one would try to use something like

       finish{
         ambient  0.05
         diffuse 0.4
         brilliance 2.5
         metallic 1.5
         specular 2 roughness 0.05
         phong 0.5 phong_size 30
         reflection{
          <0,1,0.5>*0.005,0.05
          metallic 0.25
          fresnel on
           falloff 0.5
           exponent sqrt(2)
         }
         }

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 01 May. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.