|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Rich wrote:
> Yes, I am using the beta version of Windows XP 2003 64bit, available for
> free from Microsoft to anyone willing to download it (or pay a small fee
> to recieve it on CD).
>
> [...]
>
> As soon as .Net is able to be run on Windows XP 64bit, I'd be willing to
> attempt the compile myself (hopefully with help from this group! :). If
> there's a freeware compiler that can do 64bit executables on Windows XP
> 64bit, I'd be willing to try that route also.
Do i understand this right, MS offers a free beta version but not a
compiler suited for generating the appropriate programs (neither free
nor for $$$)?
You can also have it easier, AFAIK both Linux and FreeBSD are available
for 64bit AMD.
> From what I've heard on the WindowsXP64 board, compiling with the
> optimizations intended for 64bit, or possibly for the AMD64 particularly,
> will increase program execution speed dramatically. That's what I
> expect, along with a better/faster/more efficient numerical precision
> when using really small, or really large, parameters in object size,
> placement, etc.
Yes, and it will also increase you car's speed, make cows give more milk
and leads to more sunny days...
SCNR.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 21 Mar. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |