On 14 Jul 2002 11:39:51 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > It was experimentally supported during beta-testing. Dig this news server if
> > you are interested why it is replaced with pow().
>
> I don't think that pow() *replaced* the hat operator. pow() has existed
> for long time.
Yes, just dump simplification, of course it is an old feature.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|