|
|
On 11 Feb 2008 00:46:49 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>Uh huh. I think there's a scale on which people define themselves; at
>one end is 100% based on your work achievements, and the other end is
>100% based on personal life. Most people are somewhere in between.
That makes sense.
>> made a goode movie - The Wicca man :)
>
>The Wicker Man, you mean. ;-)
>
It sounds the same to me :)
>>
>> You are winning :)
>
>But of course. :-)
>
Roll up! Roll up! See the massacre!
Tickets, a groat children a bawbee.
>In some ways it is kinda an odd job, because the hours are "fixed" but
>they're not fixed, if you know what I mean.
>
Mine too, remember "you can't do enough for a good company"
>> Don't you love our lords and masters :)
>
>Yeah, right up to the point they decide they don't need you.
>
Ain't that true. N.B. Andrew :)
>>>> And as my old granny used to say. "What's for you, won't go past you."
>>>
>>>Your granny sounds like a wise woman.
>>
>> Well that is an attitude designed to keep people in their places, I
>> feel.
>
>Well, I don't know about that, at least not my reading from what you
>wrote. It sounds more a sort of fatalistic approach (not unlike my own
>approach to life at that). Whatever happens happens sort of thing.
>
She did mean it kindly but she was born a hundred years ago. People's attitudes
were different then. I believe that you make your own luck. Again N.B. Andrew :)
>I used to live not far from Dan Farmer, but sadly never did get an
>opportunity to meet him IRL.
>
Shame.
>>>Well, just remember, we're all unique, just like everyone else. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Unless you're a clone :)
>
>Ah, but at the point that the clone becomes sentient, then the clone's
>experiences are going to be different from yours. Think Will & Thomas
>Riker. :-)
>
If you insist :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|