On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:07:55 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>You can argue about the names. 

There's no argument about the names.  I won't let you call an apple an orange without
pointing out that it really is an apple (although it may have an orange hue to it).

>The point is it provides wildly more 
>functionallity than we actually need.

Based on your description of your network, that sounds true.  It's kind of like frying
an egg with a nuclear reactor.  (Well not to that extreme, but you catch my drift.) 
Have you asked them why they
opted for the more expensive Cisco units?

Post a reply to this message