|
 |
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:01:31 +0100, Le Forgeron <jgr### [at] free fr> wrote:
>Short version: the box used for the computation of the
>superellipsoid must be a bit bigger than the perfect {-1,1} box, due
>to numerical precision. 1% is enough.
>If not, some point computed during the evaluation of the ray
>intersecting with the superellipsoid will be found to be outside of
>the bounding 'perfect' box... and removed from the intersection list.
Makes sense. Good catch!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
