On 7 Mar 2004 15:12:16 -0500, Eamon Caddigan <eca### [at] uiucedu>
wrote:

>IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:48:50 +0100, "Thorsten Froehlich"
>><tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <404b7a76@news.povray.org> , Lutz-Peter Hooge <lpv### [at] gmxde> 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unlikely, I doubt there is any sigificant market for graphics viewer
>>>> utilities even on windows. So I don't think support for jpeg2k will
>>>> be brought to other systems by commercial software.
>>>
>>>Actually, on Mac OS QuickTime supports it.  So in just about any decent Mac
>>>OS newsreader and web browser one can view the image inline.  Still, there
>>>is no value added by it being JPEG 2000 and in 16 bits per color component.
>>
>> The value is in the better compression.
>
>And the 640x480 filesize limitation imposed by your favorite plugin!

It's not my favourite, it's a suggestion. I use Photoshop. Lordy, why
don't you try to keep up?

>
>Oh, wait...
>
>-Eamon

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message