"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in
news:3f603bce$1@news.povray.org: 

> "Marc Champagne" <marcch.AT.videotron.DOT.ca> wrote in message
> news:Xns### [at] 204213191226...
>>
>> Would it not be wise for the scale statement to assume 1 instead of 0
>> for those vectors that are not specified.
>>
> 
> A common request. I *think* the problem is that If the default for an
> unspecified vector was changed to 1, this would have an impact on
> translate and rotate vectors (where defaulting to 0 is desired).

Defaulting to 1 would only be for scale of course as it ends up being 1
in the end anyways... 
 
> In the end, you are only getting a warning, which you may ignore.

Post a reply to this message