POV-Ray : Newsgroups : irtc.stills : Warfare interpretation : Re: Warfare interpretation Server Time
23 Dec 2024 02:56:55 EST (-0500)
  Re: Warfare interpretation  
From: Simon de Vet
Date: 4 Sep 2001 13:13:20
Message: <Xns911290E5CACBsdevetistarca@204.213.191.226>
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote in
news:3B94891E.A81AFD2B@ignorancia.org: 

>   No, all these are very good! And they fit perfectly with "anything
> involving a battle": do people come to underground shelters for
> pleasure? No, it is because there is a battle outside. So it "involves
> a battle", but out of the scene. That's perfectly on topic! And it's
> brilliant, because it shows the war trough it's social impact, rather
> than directly showing the war itself, which can be somewhat
> "impersonal".

That's what I was hoping. I just dread seeing a hundred "Tank shoots Tank, 
Plane shoots Ship" images. The interesting part of warfare is not the 
hardware.

-- Simon


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.