Chris Huff <chr### [at] maccom> wrote in <chrishuff-I was replying to didn't 
seem to understand that.

>What I can't understand is the problem with MegaPOV or the other 
>unofficial versions...or why he doesn't like the idea that POV source 
>code isn't allowed to be used in anything but POV, or that distributing 
>crippled versions isn't allowed.
>And the insistence on complaining in spite of a public announcement that 
>the POV Team is considering a different, possibly Open Source license is 
>a bit strange.
>

Hey, I'm not complaining.  I've stated several times that I love PovRay and 
appreciate the work that the PovTeam is doing.  Perhaps I was just airing 
my opinions too harshly (I have a tendency to do that... People often tell 
me I'm opninionated;-).  Anyways, my love for PovRay far outweighs my 
dislike for it's license, which is why I've decided to stop mentioning it.  
Also, after a reread of the license and some consideration of the replies 
to my original message, I suppose the license isn't that bad.

"Strangely", Hookflash

<><

Post a reply to this message