|
|
In article <4832f58e$1@news.povray.org>,
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid says...
> scott wrote:
> >
> > Have different speed limits depending on how much pollution your car
> > produces. Allow the most fuel efficient cars to go slightly faster tha
n
> > they can today, and make other cars go slower. In the centre of cities
>
> That would require more lanes. On a normal 2-lane (1 per direction) road
> different limits on same-class cars only generates angry drivers, while
> the traffic ain't smooth and easy anymore, but there's lots and lots of
> overtakes going on all the time.
>
Its also gibberish. There is a sweet spot in which engines will run
while burning the "maximum" amount of available fuel, without producing
extra waste products or failing to combust it. For every car
manufactured *ever*, this is between 50-60 miles an hour (due to what
the RPMs are at that speed). Letting a less polluting car go faster
won't work because them moment it goes faster it starts to burn the fuel
less efficiently, which means pumping more in, some of which doesn't
combust, and that means a) your producing *more* pollution, and b) using
more fuel than before. The only sort of vehicle that "could" use such a
rule might be a hybrid, but then *only* do to the fact that the gas
engine is "tuned" to always run at optimal RPM when operating, and the
question because if it can generate enough current to sustain the higher
speed while "at" that optimal RPM. If it can't, you're still not gaining
anything.
--
void main () {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|