BTW. Here is something for Mr. VanSickle, and any one else that thinks 
Expelled invokation of Hitler makes any sense:

From Hitler's Tischgespraeche for 1942:

'Woher nehmen wir das Recht zu glauben, der Mensch sei nicht von 
Uranfaengen das gewesen , was er heute ist? Der Blick in die Natur zeigt 
uns, dass im Bereich der Pflanzen und Tiere Veraenderungen und 
Weiterbildungen vorkommen. Aber nirgends zeigt sich innherhalb einer 
Gattung eine Entwicklung von der Weite des Sprungs, den der Mensch 
gemacht haben muesste, sollte er sich aus einem affenartigen Zustand zu 
dem, was er ist, fortgebildet haben.'

In English:

'From where do we get the right to believe that man was not from the 
very beginning what he is today.

A glance in Nature shows us, that changes and developments happen in the 
realm of plants and animals. But nowhere do we see inside a kind, a 
development of the size of the leap that Man must have made, if he 
supposedly has advanced from an ape-like condition to what he is'

This is about as close as you can get to the claims made by ID about 
kinds, whether or not Macro-evolution happens, or how/if complexity can 
develop from earlier states as you can get. Someone want to explain to 
me how this gets you a) atheism or b) evolution by natural selection... 
Its damn odd hearing the people claiming to be about free speech and the 
truth, using an argument to support teaching their hypothesis in science 
class, which mirrors so precisely what the very person they accuse 
"science" of acting like, used to claim superiority over those he 
considered beneath him.

-- 
void main () {

    if version = "Vista" {
      call slow_by_half();
      call DRM_everything();
    }
    call functional_code();
  }
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message