In article <475db913$1@news.povray.org>, dne### [at] sanrrcom says...
> > To prove a positive I only need to find one item with the required prop
erty.
> > "Some grass is green". Easy as pie to prove. 
> 
> Harder than you think, actually. Grass *isn't* green. It looks green to
 
> you. "Green" is an interaction between you and the grass (and to some 
> extent the light sources etc), not a property of the grass itself.
> 
Its also rather an ironic argument, since I have yet to see anyone show 
any **item** that has **any** attribute that has been attributed to any 
sort of God. I mean, if you want to assert the positive position that 
such a thing exists, wouldn't it, by his own definition, require, at 
bare minimum, that even one tiny fragment of evidence could be applied 
to at least on "god", for the idea that any such god exists, or more to 
the point, that *their* god exists? lol

-- 
void main () {

    if version = "Vista" {
      call slow_by_half();
      call DRM_everything();
    }
    call functional_code();
  }
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message