In article <404e9fb8$1@news.povray.org>, dne### [at] sanrrcom says...
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
> > The only real advantage a 
> > digital camera gives is "instant use" of the image or the ability to 
> > transfer it to your laptop as you take it
> 
> Well, that and the ability to see what you've taken as soon as you take 
> it and to throw away the crappy photos for essentially zero cost. When 
> you take 10 times as many photos as you normally would and reshoot the 
> ones that didn't come out as you expect, you wind up with a lot better 
> pictures.  Of course, if you're an experienced professional, you don't 
> need to do such a thing.
> 
> If you're getting visible artifacts from a good digital camera, you are 
> definitely good enough that you ought to be using film. ;-)
> 
> 
That rather depends on the camera. Every manufacturer uses different 
setting to 'optimize' and the best one isn't always the one with the 
highest price either. I would prefer something that if compressed didn't 
have 50 different options some company could tweak to screw up the final 
result. ;)

-- 
void main () {

    call functional_code()
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

Post a reply to this message