[This followup was posted to povray.windows and a copy was sent to the 
cited author.]

In article <8F78B0EC4soren2000j@news.povray.org>, 
sor### [at] noYOUknowWHATjunocom says...

> Since you asked ..
> 
> It would be a serious breach if you posted their replies publically without 
> getting prior consent from them. [Treating people as human beings with respect 
> is priority number one when you are trying to get someone to listen to you .. 
> and that --respect-- is what Netiquette is basically about. But see below.]
> 
> Copying the messages to one personal friend is another matter. Lawyers can 
> differ (and can go to h___). Common sense: send such communications only 
> privately to a person who shares your concerns about an issue; you've been 
> corresponding with a *company* (representatives thereof) in their official 
> capacity. This relaxes some of the stringency of ethical dictates concerning 
> priviledged communications IMO.
> 
> If a company representative is abusive to you, all bets are off -- post their 
> stuff to public fora freely. THAT's a public service.

Hi, are you in the know about those 64-byte PNG's? I still have them and 
they still freeze my ACDSee viewer. There has not been a definitive 
recognition of the problem by the makers of ACDSee. But I can live with 
them...

-- 
----------------
Regards,  Sander

Post a reply to this message