Wasn't it quark67 who wrote:
>Mike Williams <nos### [at] econymdemoncouk> wrote:
>> Wasn't it quark67 who wrote:
>
>> >Please see the pictures that illustrate this here :
>> >http://quark67.free.fr/isosurface.html
>>
>> You can decrease the accuracy. In this case try
>>         accuracy 0.00001
>> The downside is that as the accuracy gets smaller, the render time
>> increases.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Williams
>> Gentleman of Leisure
>
>Hello, you can see in the web page http://quark67.free.fr/isosurface.html what
>an
>accuracy 1e-6
>get after "code 4" on the page (1e-6=0.000001).
>This is not better :(

It looks better than that for me. What anti-aliassing are you using?

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure

Post a reply to this message