Chris Huff wrote:

>I think a better solution would be to just add a new image type, so you 
>wouldn't be limited to height fields, but could use it in media density, 
>image/texture maps, isosurfaces, etc. It is a good suggestion, though. 
>Some of the image formats useable by POV are very simple though...some 
>only slightly more complex than this.
>

How different would it be from the "i_dat3d" library with data_2d_1 or 
data_2d_3, if at all ?


Ingo

-- 
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray    : http://members.home.nl/seed7/

Post a reply to this message