Bill DeWitt wrote:

>But to use the only good series of images I ever posted, those in which
>a stone full of flowers was developed, much of the related discussion
>-should- have been in scene-files,...

If you did post the scene file and there was scene file related discussion, 
yes. 
If there were a discussion on something like composition or lightning, I'd 
like to have it with the picture, not the scene file.

>... and I should have deleted the two(?) test images. 

No! Also the development of a picture is interesting.
I think of TonyB's empty hallway, hallway with little people, hallway with 
magician. TonyB's moutainscape with bridge, Mick Hazelgrove's gate and red 
sea images.

>Not to mention that there were a whole series of "equally distributed 
>points around a sphere" posts whose images would be better stored as a
>scene file than as a finished render.

Here I'd say one or two pictures and the rest indeed as a scene file. Same 
with the fractal boxes. But seeing he whole process was interesting.

Ingo

-- 
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray    : http://members.home.nl/seed7/

Post a reply to this message