|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Fabian Brau wrote:
>.....
>if the purpose it to make picture which are not photorealistic it
>is not necessary to add functionnality to software like Povray (I
>mean caustic, radiosity,...).
I totally disagree with this, for making non-realistic work also
caustics, radiosity,...etc are needed and much more is needed.
I sometimes even think this urge for realism is a limitation for the
(creative) developpement of programms like pov-ray. Why not make this
"don't know what to call it" object / feature?
From a scientific point of view though, I can understand this interest
for realism.
Photo-realism: What is the realism in photography?
http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/blue/lightscapes/ilightscapes.html
This is some of my photography (the site is very unfinished)
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |