On 4/15/2024 10:51 PM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 4/15/24 15:31, RATH, CHRISTOPHER A wrote:
>> However, when I used a value < 1, I was running into the floating 
>> point range problem that was giving very weird results.
> 
> Moving to a smaller isosurface accuracy setting(a) might well help too, 
> if you've not already tried it.
> 
> Bill P.
> 
> (a) - As a rough rule, accuracy values of 1e-5 / 1e=6 are about the best 
> we can actually achieve with isosurfaces.
> 
I'm actually using 1e-7, which seems to make a difference from 1e-6. 
I'm not getting any artifacts at 1e-7, but there are a few on the front 
of bubbles at 1e-6.

-- 
-- Chris R

Post a reply to this message