|
 |
Op 9-2-2024 om 13:33 schreef Bald Eagle:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
>
>> 2) Point 1 is crucial to define/calculate the target triangle. It is
>> *not* defined from the origin but from the initial triangle.
>>
>> 3) All apices from the triangle have to be translated by an identical
>> vector value. If not, you may have interesting surprises, mostly
>> additional rotations to the object. However, those are difficult to
>> control from the onset if used on purpose.
>
> Right. The macro takes your exact triangle, and moves it from right where it
> is, to exactly where it would be if you moved it there with some unknown
> combinations of rotations and translations.
>
Yes, that works very straightforward indeed.
> I did wonder what would happen if I jimmied some of the target triangle
> coordinates, and yes, the triangles got moved - but I have yet to quantify
> exactly how.
>
There are some unknown (to me) issues there which I want to delve deeper
into, as for instance those making the object rotate around one or more
axis, as I wrote earlier, under comment 3. It might be a powerful,
additional, feature if we understand how and under what conditions, it
can be used in a controlled way.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
