|
 |
Op 01/03/2021 om 08:49 schreef Thomas de Groot:
> Op 28/02/2021 om 16:43 schreef Kenneth:
>> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>>> (assumed_gamma 1.0), and get identical results to your middle image.
>>> So far, so
>>> good ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, they are not quite identical after all.
>>
>> I thought I would do a side-by-side comparison of your v3.6
>> assumed_gamma 1.0
>> version to v3.8xx (I changed the "skies.inc" pigments back to their
>> originals.)
>>
>> There's a definite difference; I assume that it comes from the many
>> 'under-the-hood' changes made to POV-ray since v3.6.
>>
>> So it seems to be very difficult to determine (and update) what the
>> author's
>> *original* visual intent was for these pigments.
>>
>>
>
> I have not tested it, but maybe your differences come from the fact that
> you use version 3.8 here. I did not, from the principle that version 3.7
> and/or 3.7.1 are the /last/ official versions of POV-Ray. As a start,
> the includes should comply with those versions. Version 3.8 is beta and
> may need more changes in future.
>
I tested and, no, you must have used some wrong settings somewhere.
versions 3.7 or 3.8 render identically.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
