On 2020-09-29 4:52 AM (-4), Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Op 28/09/2020 om 19:52 schreef Kenneth:
>> Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>>
>>>

>>> is often no tree trunk shadow, probably due to them being narrower than
>>> a pixel, and this makes the shadows seem disconnected from the trees.
>>
>> Well... I was wrong-- the shadows do line up. My apologies, Thomas! My 
>> eyes seem
>> to be working better today ;-) Yes, what threw me off were the missing 
>> (i.e.,
>> too thin) tree trunks in the tree shadows, and not seeing where the 
>> actual tree
>> trunks meet the ground.
>>
> 
> I was in doubt about the trees because of their trunks. I may use others 
> instead.

Have you tried using +AM3?  I'm thinking that stochastic sampling may 
hit areas that are missed by the more "orderly" methods.

Post a reply to this message