On 22.07.2020 01:39, jr wrote:
>> And if you read a little about the history, you'd know that the code
>> *can't*  be published publicly because there is proprietary code that
>> needs to be scrubbed.
 >
> _parts_  of the code.  no reason why the remainder could not have been worked on,
> and no reason why a functional specification of the proprietary code could not
> have been published.

And that specification comes out of thin air? And the splitting of the 
code between proprietary and available for publication comes out of thin 
air, too? - The answer is simple: No and no.

Post a reply to this message