On 6/5/20 6:43 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> ...
> Similar. For agate most of the impact looks to me to be from:
>
> static inline const ClassicTurbulence *GetTurb(const WarpList warps)
> {
> ClassicTurbulence*>(*warps.begin()));
> }
>
...
Couple coffees and now wondering if some of what I see is just that I
have that pattern assert on...
In any case, my plan is to slowly remove the special turbulence
handling. If I remember, I'll look at agate vs f_agate performance again
when I get back to pattern cleanup work again. Focused elsewhere at the
moment.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|