On 20-5-2019 21:31, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 19-5-2019 11:58, Norbert Kern wrote:
>>
>> Question: shouldn't 'method 2' not be 'method 3' in the media?
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
> 
> 
> I tried method 3, but it was slower, not better - but I made the test in an
> early stage...
> 
> Norbert
> 

I suggest to use method 3 all right, but with a much lower samples 
value: 600 instead of 1600 is already much faster and without 
significant view deterioration. You can probably even lower it much 
more. With samples 100 the image becomes a bit splotchy though.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message