Am 05.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Le Forgeron:

>> If "orientation" in warps does exactly(!) the same, that would be the
>> parameter name to use.
>>
>> Otherwise, there are probably better names to pick. "uv_orientation",
>> maybe?
>>
> 
> it would rather be u_orientation, or u_something, as v is already set by
> the shape and its symetry. u_zero ?

"UV" in the sense of "UV mapping" as the whole concept.

> "second_base_vector_of_half_plane_with_symetry_axis_where_u_is_zero" is
> far too long.

A tad, yes ;)

Post a reply to this message