|
|
On 29/06/2018 13:10, Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 28/06/2018 18:26, Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>>> It is extremely unlikely that anything
>>> will replace UTF-8 any time soon...
>>
>> Who in their right mind would ever need more than 640k of ram?
>>
>> ;-)
>
> ROFL - at least designers of standards got smarter and Unicode is pretty
> extensible, though the focus seems to be on more and more emoticons...
>
>
>
>
I could not resist it. It is a classic (rebuff).
I think that in English, emoticons are not a bad idea*. As English can
be quite ambiguous.
Warp seldom used them and I was always misunderstanding his meaning. :-(
For instance. Replying "interesting". Does not mean "It is interesting"
but "Not worth perusing, it is not a good idea".
*
I don't mean crying cats and the like.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|