On 22/04/2018 19:00, Kenneth wrote:
> Stephen<mca### [at] aolcom>  wrote:
>> On 21/04/2018 20:33, Kenneth wrote:
>>> Actually, it would need to be <1.5,2,3.5>-- the .5 part of the x and z offsets
>>> correctly shift the (1-unit) cells/cubes for the next higher 'alternating' row
>>> of bricks. Without that, the alternate rows of bricks show half of one
>>> color and half of another-- because the bricks themselves are naturally
>>> offset by this amount.
>> Would <1.5,2,3.5> * 2 not work?
>>
> No, because you would end up with  <3,4,3>, which would be the wrong 'degree' of
> offset in x and z-- for every*other*  row of bricks. (Y of 4 is perfectly OK,
> though.)


Oh! I thought it might be too simple a solution.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message