|
|
Am 21.01.2018 um 21:56 schrieb William F Pokorny:
> Is this the expected behavior for media_attenuation?
The documentation for the feature specifically mentions "fog or
atmospheric media" (as opposed to object-contained media), so I'd say,
yes, that's the intended behaviour. Other portions of that same docs
section refer to "the fog or media", but I'd take that to be just a lazy
reference to the more precise term used earlier.
Post a reply to this message
|
|