On 12/04/2017 05:46 PM, clipka wrote:
> 
> A curious find.
> 
> Indeed, the parser does recognize the keyword "steps" as a token
> (STEPS_TOKEN), but this token is never actually tested for, i.e. it
> doesn't do anything in any context.
> 
> The keyword appears to have been introduced in v3.5.0 (it was absent in
> v3.1g but present in v3.5.0c) without ever having been actually used
> (verified for v3.5.0c, v3.6.0, v3.6.1 and v3.8.0-alpha).
> 

Who added it?

---
dik

Post a reply to this message