On 21/11/2017 11:43, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 21-11-2017 10:31, Stephen wrote:
>> On 21/11/2017 07:54, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My main focus now is to get a "better" (?) coverage of the arms and 
>>> legs compared to the body. They seem to be more sparsely populated. 
>>> So, my idea was to use an additional test: function 
>>> {pow(f_boxed(x,y,z),2)} provided by Christian Froeschlin some years 
>>> ago, and thus concentrate the objects more towards the periphery than 
>>> towards the centre. However, I am not sure what I am doing and I have 
>>> difficulty scaling this to the correct proportions of the body. Any 
>>> suggestions there would help me.
>>>
>>
>> Could you split your analysis into body part groups? That might give 
>> yo more control over the sizes of the "filler" boxes.
> 
> That would be one option indeed. I keep that for when all else fails. ;-)
> 

It sounds like a lot of work. ;-)

>>
>>>>

>>>>
>>>
>>> Me too.
>>>
>>
>> Reflective spheres would be interesting, I think. :-)
>>
> 
> Oh yes, and blobs (reflective or not) too.
> 

Blobs! yes. :-D

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message