On 25/09/2017 11:52, Kenneth wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 23/09/2017 14:39, Kenneth wrote:
>>
>>> But here's a really interesting feature (the most important one, IMO):
>>> Although the illusion.inc 'camera position' is supposed to match the
>>> scene's real camera-- for the best undistorted image reproduction--
>>> the scene camera CAN be moved around (somewhat, within limits.) I've
>>> used this for some really cool animations; the visual result is like
>>> a 3-D 'matte painting'.
>>>
>>
>> Examples, please. :-)
>> Flaunt it. :-)
>>
> Unfortunately, those animations (and LOTS of my older POV-ray files and such)
> are on a backup hard-drive that failed(!). 

Ouch!
At least it wasn't your own fault. I've just wiped two hard disks by my 
own carelessness. Three years worth of stuff. (Rude word! rude word! 
rude word!)

> HOPEFULLY it's just the motor or
> drive electronics. I hope to resurrect those files at some point, even if I have
> to pay one of those 'forensic' companies to extract the data. Not cheap though,
> ouch.
> 

I've just looked at some prices. Ouch indeed.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message