On 31-7-2017 12:34, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 7/31/2017 2:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 31-7-2017 2:54, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 7/22/2017 9:42 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>> can't decide if marble / subsurface is next ... or glass!
>>>
>>> here's a marble version ... there were some problems with the model 
>>> that were hidden by the procedural normal i used on the granite 
>>> version. much trial and error then smoothing the vertex weights 
>>> around the cut outs fixed it ... didn't even have to subdivide or use 
>>> shade smooth. blender did do a pretty decent job on the uv mapping as 
>>> well. i /do/ see a couple of /hot/ pixels i think a tad too much 
>>> translucency. a little bit more work and i think this one's ready for 
>>> a beauty run!
>>>
>>
>> The translucency looks ok to me. The marble is gorgeous.
> 
> well i'll only take partial credit for that ... it's an image map. 
> getting the uv mapping correct was the challenge
> 

Oh! Yes, I can imagine the puzzle for this kind of object! ;-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message