On 7/31/2017 2:46 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 31-7-2017 2:54, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 7/22/2017 9:42 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> can't decide if marble / subsurface is next ... or glass!
>>
>> here's a marble version ... there were some problems with the model 
>> that were hidden by the procedural normal i used on the granite 
>> version. much trial and error then smoothing the vertex weights around 
>> the cut outs fixed it ... didn't even have to subdivide or use shade 
>> smooth. blender did do a pretty decent job on the uv mapping as well. 
>> i /do/ see a couple of /hot/ pixels i think a tad too much 
>> translucency. a little bit more work and i think this one's ready for 
>> a beauty run!
>>
> 
> The translucency looks ok to me. The marble is gorgeous.

well i'll only take partial credit for that ... it's an image map. 
getting the uv mapping correct was the challenge

Post a reply to this message