On 7/31/2017 1:54 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 7/22/2017 9:42 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> can't decide if marble / subsurface is next ... or glass!
>
> here's a marble version ... there were some problems with the model that
> were hidden by the procedural normal i used on the granite version. much
> trial and error then smoothing the vertex weights around the cut outs
> fixed it ... didn't even have to subdivide or use shade smooth. blender
> did do a pretty decent job on the uv mapping as well. i /do/ see a
> couple of /hot/ pixels i think a tad too much translucency. a little bit
> more work and i think this one's ready for a beauty run!
>

I like the texture and yes a bit too much translucency.

I appreciated the description and must read up on vertex weights. As I 
have a model that is showing artefacts that Ctrl + N does not fix.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message