POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Gem settings: opinions wanted : Re: Gem settings: opinions wanted Server Time
25 Apr 2024 07:30:13 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Gem settings: opinions wanted  
From: Cousin Ricky
Date: 25 Jun 2017 12:16:23
Message: <594fe1d7@news.povray.org>
On 2017-06-20 09:35 AM (-4), Stephen wrote:
> I like those but I think I would need to see the gems in the settings to
> make a comparison.

A setting, fully loaded (radiosity, photons, camera DOF), renders in 
minutes.  A round brilliant stone, fully loaded (above + dispersion), 
renders in minutes.  The setting and stone combined in one scene?  Many 
hours!

I sacrificed dispersion, lowered max_trace_level, and used 2-pass 
radiosity for these renders.  This cut render times to under 15 minutes 
each.

I also made a tweak to plan E where the prongs join the base.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'setting_survey-set-a.jpg' (48 KB) Download 'setting_survey-set-b.jpg' (48 KB) Download 'setting_survey-set-c.jpg' (48 KB) Download 'setting_survey-set-d.jpg' (48 KB) Download 'setting_survey-set-e1.jpg' (49 KB) Download 'setting_survey-set-e2.jpg' (49 KB)

Preview of image 'setting_survey-set-a.jpg'
setting_survey-set-a.jpg

Preview of image 'setting_survey-set-b.jpg'
setting_survey-set-b.jpg

Preview of image 'setting_survey-set-c.jpg'
setting_survey-set-c.jpg

Preview of image 'setting_survey-set-d.jpg'
setting_survey-set-d.jpg

Preview of image 'setting_survey-set-e1.jpg'
setting_survey-set-e1.jpg

Preview of image 'setting_survey-set-e2.jpg'
setting_survey-set-e2.jpg


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.