On 21-6-2017 11:40, Stephen wrote:
> On 6/21/2017 7:45 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 20-6-2017 23:04, Stephen wrote:
> 
>>> So what I would do, knowing that most of the guys here have been using
>>> PovRay for years and they are wizards at maths and programming. Is to
>>> start simple then refine it as you go along.
>>> The image you linked to was by someone who stuns everyone with his
>>> work. So it is not a fair goal to try and do in a couple of months.
>>>
>>> If you look at the trace function it will tell you how far away an
>>> object is from a reference point. If you move that reference point in
>>> a regular scan. You can build up a pattern of spheres. When you are
>>> happy with that you can then add some randomness to what you are
>>> building. Irregular scaling of the spheres to be laid down to give the
>>> impression of stones. offset the trace reference point so the spheres
>>> don't stack up in columns etc.
>>> Then you will get ideas of your own to enhance it.
>>
>> That is a good way to start. I shall have to try that scenario myself
>> too I guess: been years since I wanted to explore that path. :-)
>>
> 
> If I can find the time I will try it in Blender. But the learning. :)
>>>
>>> Remember us enjuneers have to make thinks work. And if it doesn't fit
>>> use a bigger hammer. ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Not only enjuneers. Small apes like me too (using stones)... ;-)
>>
> 
> [Top tip] Tie a stick to your stone. :)

Tried that. Stick broke. :={

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message