On 4/27/2017 7:59 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 27-4-2017 0:29, Stephen wrote:

>
> Only +am3 sets stochastic rendering. I like it but it is much slower imo
> when set to high quality like +ac99. However, I may be wrong as I have
> not compared renders seriously. Clipka would know ;-) I little bit of
> grainy image is not a problem to me although it is difficult to balance
> quality versus (acceptable) render time. I am not always that patient.
>

That is the crux of the matter. How long you are willing to wait for the 
quality you want.


> With Dhalgren, I used +am2, so no stochastic rendering there.
>

But I did a couple of runs with +am3 as it was the first time I had used 
UberPov.

>>
>> I am an egg. :-)
>> Albeit a thousand-year-old egg. Yum yum.
>>
>
> Hum... I am a bit reluctant to have a bite :-)
>

They are really nice. They are a bit like haggis, in the way the taste 
is linked to the way you catch them. ;-)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message