On 04/01/2017 12:26 PM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 11:59 PM, Mike Horvath wrote:
>>
>> How long did those take to render? Isosurfaces are usually very slow.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
> Rendered just now, 900x600 +A0.3, in a 3.72 branch without the recent
> performance improvements of 3.71's, the demo soft_object takes 3 minutes
> and the demo hard_object 1m 45s wall clock on my 2 core, 4 thread, I3.
>
> Bill P.

I forgot I posted a hard_objectA.jpg image too - using warp turbulence 
values I don't recall. More turbulence usually drives up the time so 
probably 2-3x the hard_object time as a guess.

Bill P.

Post a reply to this message